Watermark Learning

A PM’s Guide to Requirements Modeling Part 2: Concurrent Requirements Modeling

Posted on
Author(s) and

Originally published in PM Times on March 30, 2015.

This article is the second in a series on requirements modeling with the emphasis on why PMs should care about modeling requirements. In our first article, we spoke generally about models, the benefits of modeling requirements, and introduced the relationship between the iterative nature of eliciting requirements and modeling them. This article discusses the concept of concurrent requirements modeling, a structure that helps us elicit the detail needed for a complete set of requirements.

Quick Review

What is a model and why should we care? A model is a representation of reality, like a model car, airplane prototype, or graphical design (e.g., a CAD drawing) of a house. As they relate to requirements, models usually consist of text, graphical representations, or both. To get good requirements, we need to ask the right questions. We need to go beyond the “who, what when, where, and why” questions and get to the detail we need. Models help us do just that.

BA Toolkit Webinar

Concurrent Requirements Modeling

OK, so models help us ask the right questions. But which models should we use? Is one model better than the others? Sources such as the BABOK® Guide and PMI’s Business Analysis Practice Guide offer dozens of potential models. We certainly don’t have time to use all of them. Of course, there is no one answer to the question of which model is best, but we can explore which models are best suited to our projects. When we are involved with improving processes, and there are a myriad of reasons for doing so, one or several process models work well. When we are building business intelligence applications for doing information analytics, or simply developing quick reports, data models are helpful. When we are developing applications and need to describe the interaction between people and the software, use cases are appropriate. And prototypes are helpful to a variety of different types of projects. For software applications, all four are important, and when we elicit and model requirements using the appropriate models pretty much at the same time, we can get to detailed requirements more quickly than if we use just one ore even two model types.

We call this approach “concurrent requirements modeling,” which is different from concurrent component engineering, or concurrency, commonly used in developing objects and e-solutions. Concurrent requirements modeling focuses on obtaining business requirements, not on building software. It suggests that by modeling business data, business processes, interactions of users and systems through use cases, and prototyping, hidden requirements will surface more quickly than if we tried to think of questions without modeling or if we tried to build the product and elicited needs in an ad hoc way. In addition, each type of modeling effort supports and enhances the other modeling efforts and encourages analysts to ask their customers the kinds of pertinent questions that drive out hidden requirements.

Figure 1 below describes the interrelationships among the different types of functional requirements. The models are particularly useful for software requirements, but can also be useful for many aspects of business analysis. The models and their interrelationships are shown below.

Concurrent Requirements Modeling

A Brief Taste of the Four Model Types

  1. Data models. Once thought to be solely the domain of the very technical developers and database administrators, data models help us understand our stakeholders’ information needs, including many of the all-important business rules. Business rules provide consistency by identifying how companies want to operate their business, and supporting these business decisions across projects. Business rules include such things as policies, calculations, sequence of events, limits, and business decisions. We’ll talk more about the business rules related to data in our next article.
  2. Process models. Our projects result in changed processes. Sometimes it’s a big change and sometimes a small one, but every project changes how people do their jobs. In order for us to understand what particular changes mean to our stakeholders, we need to know what they are doing today and how that will be different when our project is completed. Process models help us with this understanding.
  3. Use case models. So much has been written about use cases. Discussions about their usefulness keep surfacing on LinkedIn groups, a few people saying that they are not useful, particularly on Agile projects, while others with equal passion building a solid case for why they have always been useful and still are. The authors side with the latter. Use cases help us answer very important questions about the interaction with software or pieces of equipment, and provide the structure needed to ask the right questions relating to that interaction.
  4. User Interface models provide prototypes. They might be done using sophisticated software or the proverbial back of a napkin or something in-between. The point is that these prototypes help stakeholders see a picture of the end product, enabling them to provide feedback and suggest changes long before it’s developed.

Working Together

When building software, data models answer the questions “what data do our stakeholders need to input,” and when they do, “what information is displayed on the user interface (screen)?” Process models give us the screen navigation. The touch point between the data and process is where there is interaction between the end user and the software. Use case models provide us with what we need to know about this interaction. User interface models graphically depict use cases. More about that in a future article.

What Does This Mean for Project Managers?

As PMs, we might not do the work ourselves, but we need to ensure that work is done. So it’s important for us to be able to have enough of an understanding of these models to ask the right project questions of the resources who will be doing the elicitation and modeling. We also think it is important to understand the value of each model type and why using multiple models will yield better project outcomes. Last, we can be far more helpful in discussions about elicitation activities, tasks, estimates, risks, etc. when we have an understanding about the subject at hand.

In the next article, we will examine the benefits of data modeling and what data questions surface when we model our information requirements.

Don’t forget to leave your comments below.

become a member

2 thoughts on “A PM’s Guide to Requirements Modeling Part 2: Concurrent Requirements Modeling

  1. Where would you put State Transition Diagrams? They are very important from a functional perspective. Ideally, there should be a separate type of model called “Event-Driven Models” or something similar.

    • I love State Diagrams (AKA State Transition Diagrams). To me it doesn’t matter what category we put them in, although I have a preference for Interaction Models,because they show the interaction between data (states) and process (transitions triggered by an event). It also seems to me that all processes are event-driven, including business processes and use cases. One can slice & dice all the models and put them in different buckets, but we have found our Concurrent Model to be useful, practical, and easily understood. We address State Diagrams in our A Practitioner’s Guide to Requirements Management book and presentation BA Toolkit: Top Models for Complete Requirements Analysis.

Leave a Reply

PMI, PMBOK, PMP, CAPM, PMI-ACP, PMI-RMP, PMI-SP, PMI-PBA, The PMI TALENT TRIANGLE and the PMI Talent Triangle logo, and the PMI Registered Education Provider logo are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc. BRMP is a registered trademark of Business Relationship Management Institute.