New Horizons New Horizons Project Management Academy Project Management Academy Six Sigma Online Six Sigma Online Velopi Velopi Watermark Learning Watermark Learning
Educate 360 Educate 360
Educate 360  Educate 360
5 whys

The 5 Whys: A Smarter Way for Business Analysts to Solve Problems

Key Takeaways

  • Lead with Curiosity: Strategic curiosity is a core skill for effective Business Analysts.
  • Find the Real Cause: The 5 Whys technique reveals the causes hidden beneath surface-level issues.
  • Use EQ with IQ: Emotional intelligence is critical when questioning stakeholders.
  • Know the Limits: The technique works best for simple problems with clear starting points.

When the Fix Isn’t More Meetings

A major project at a mid-sized company is again falling behind schedule. Meetings are held, emails fly, and a few fingers are quietly pointed. Someone suggests adding more resources. Another says it’s the vendor’s fault. A manager proposes holding another stand-up meeting because what this team really needs is more meetings.

What no one’s doing? Figuring out why the delays keep happening.

In such situations, a Business Analyst (BA) proves their value—not by slapping on a quick fix, but by calmly stepping back, asking thoughtful questions, and getting everyone to look deeper. They know treating symptoms might bring temporary relief, but it won’t stop the problem from returning. So, what does? Digging into the root cause. And one of the best tools in a BA’s toolkit for that? The deceptively simple “5 Whys.”

But before we get to the technique, let’s talk about something that drives every good Business Analyst: strategic curiosity.

Curiosity Isn’t Just for Kids—It’s a BA’s Superpower

Good BAs are trained to be professionally skeptical—in the most helpful way possible. That means they don’t just accept the first explanation they hear. They keep asking until the full picture comes into focus. They question assumptions, check the facts, and peel back layers to reveal what’s really going on.

Strategic curiosity means more than just being nosy. It means asking questions that reveal patterns, expose broken processes, and highlight decisions that didn’t age well. BAs aren’t content with the nearest explanation when deadlines slip, or a project’s scope balloons. They look for evidence, listen closely, and, most importantly, ask the right questions at the right time.

That’s why they rarely stop with the first answer they hear.

When someone says, “The project is late because tasks took longer than expected,” the BA’s internal radar goes off. Why did they take longer? Were estimates off? Were requirements unclear? Was the team working on the wrong thing? Or did five other problems collide at once? The first answer is rarely the whole story.

Want to know how BAs consistently uncover the full story? Let’s look at the deceptively simple 5 Whys and how this powerful method supports effective root cause analysis in business analysis without overcomplicating things.

What’s This “5 Whys” Thing, Anyway?

At its core, the “5 Whys” technique is exactly what it sounds like: ask “Why?” five times in a row (or however many times it takes) until you get to the root of a problem.

It was originally developed by Sakichi Toyoda, one of the minds behind Toyota’s production system. While it was designed for manufacturing, it works just as well in business analysis, project management, or figuring out why your team’s process keeps missing a step.

Why is it so effective? Because most problems aren’t caused by one big, dramatic failure—they’re usually the result of smaller issues quietly piling up. Asking “why” repeatedly helps you uncover what’s really going on—like why your team keeps missing deadlines, not just why everyone’s calendar is a mess.

But let’s be clear: it’s not about hitting a magic number. Sometimes, three “whys” will do the job. Other times, you’ll need six or more. The point is to keep asking until you uncover something you can fix—not just something you can blame.

It might seem basic, but when you use this problem-solving technique the right way, it can save time, money, and a lot of headaches.

Before we get to an example, let’s look at how BAs ask “why” the right way—because asking it the wrong way can stop answers before they start.

Ask, Don’t Interrogate: Tips for Using the 5 Whys Effectively

Getting the most out of the 5 Whys takes more than just asking questions—it’s about how you ask them. If people feel blamed, they might shut down or give short, unclear answers. That slows things down and keeps the real problem hidden.

To make the most of this technique, BAs rely on emotional intelligence (EQ) just as much as analytical thinking. They know that the goal isn’t to play detective but to create a space where people feel safe sharing what’s happening.

Here are a few key tips BAs follow to get honest, helpful answers:

  • Make it conversational. It’s not an interrogation—it’s a conversation.
  • Avoid blame. Focus on the process, not the person. Blame shuts people down, while curiosity opens them up.
  • Listen actively. Sometimes, the actual answer hides behind what’s being said.
  • Collaborate. Bring people into the process—work together instead of trying to solve problems alone.
  • Document your trail. Show how one answer led to the next so everyone can follow the thinking—and see why the solution makes sense.

Used skillfully, the 5 Whys builds trust. People feel heard. Problems get solved. And you avoid quick fixes that cause new problems down the line.

Now that you have the right tone and approach let’s examine how the 5 Whys apply to a real project situation.

Putting the 5 Whys to Work: How Business Analysts Dig Deep

It all starts with a clear problem. Teams skip this step more often than you’d think. And without a shared understanding of the problem that you’re trying to solve, you’re just guessing. Once the problem’s nailed down, the BA can start with the first “why.”

Let’s say a company is constantly missing project deadlines. Here’s a simple 5 Whys example for project management and how a BA might approach it:

  1. Why are we missing deadlines? Because tasks are taking longer than planned.
  2. Why are they taking longer? Because the team didn’t fully understand the requirements.
  3. Why didn’t they understand the requirements? Because the requirements kept changing.
  4. Why did the requirements change so often? Because stakeholders weren’t aligned at the start.
  5. Why weren’t they aligned? Because the initial discovery phase was rushed to meet an arbitrary kickoff date.

Instead of “let’s just add more resources,” the solution becomes “let’s improve how we plan and agree on what needs to be done at the beginning of the project.” By identifying the process as the real issue, you can stop similar delays from happening again.

This questioning method is a straightforward problem-solving approach that helps BAs focus on lasting fixes and gives teams a clearer view of what’s really going on—so they can solve the right problem. It also gives BAs a solid explanation to share with stakeholders and keep everyone on the same page.

Now that we’ve seen how the 5 Whys work in practice let’s discuss where they work best and where you might need another tool.

When the 5 Whys Work—and When They Don’t

The 5 Whys approach works best in certain situations. It’s most effective when the problem is straightforward and doesn’t involve too many moving parts, such as bottlenecks, recurring errors, or missed deadlines.

It’s less effective when the problem is complicated and involves multiple teams—like trying to figure out why a large company-wide software launch didn’t go as planned. If multiple causes interact across departments, you may need more advanced analysis tools like Fishbone (Ishikawa) diagrams, process maps, or impact assessments.

When to Use the 5 Whys:

  • A problem has a clear starting point
  • You’re working with a small team or department
  • You want to uncover a root cause quickly

When Not to Use the 5 Whys:

  • Problems span multiple teams or systems
  • There are several competing definitions of the issue
  • You need to model dependencies or timelines

The 5 Whys isn’t the right fit for every situation, but it’s still one of the best tools for getting past surface-level issues and finding real answers. When used well, it helps BAs stay focused, keep teams aligned, and work toward solutions that stick. Whether you use it on its own or with other methods, it’s a skill every BA should have in their toolkit.

Good BAs Dig. Great Ones Don’t Stop Digging

The best Business Analysts aren’t satisfied with surface-level answers. They know every recurring issue has a deeper story and are willing to ask the right questions to find it. That’s what makes the “5 Whys” such an effective problem-solving technique. It’s not just a method—it’s a mindset.

When used with care, it helps teams move past blame and start building better systems. It clears the fog, prevents repeat issues, and helps teams focus on solving the right problem.

Want to get better at asking “why” like a pro? Whether you’re just starting your journey as a Business Analyst or looking to deepen your expertise, Watermark Learning can help. Our training programs are designed to build practical skills, strengthen strategic thinking, and boost your confidence—no matter where you are in your career.

Reach out today to learn how we can help you become the kind of leader who doesn’t just ask questions—but asks the right ones.

Dr Jay Pugh
Jay Pugh, PhD
Head of Leadership Growth | Website |  + posts

Dr. Jay Pugh is an award-winning leader, author, and facilitator with over 18 years of teaching and training experience. Currently serving as Head of Leadership Growth at Educate 360, he leads a robust team of external and internal facilitators who specialize in developing leadership capabilities within medium and large-scale businesses. His team works directly with business professionals, helping them become more effective leaders in their daily operations.

Dr. Pugh holds a Ph.D. in Instructional Management and Leadership, and his academic contributions include two published articles and a dissertation focusing on various educational topics. His extensive experience and academic background have established him as a respected voice in leadership development and educational management.